Search for: "Motion to Quash Subpoena"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 11:06 am
Both received an e-mail from Twitter on Tuesday saying the company would respond to the subpoena (.pdf) in a week “unless we receive notice from you that a motion to quash the subpoena has been filed or that this matter has been otherwise resolved. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 10:00 am
The trial court denied Sallie Mae’s motion to quash, holding that the information was relevant and should be produced. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 10:00 am
The trial court denied Sallie Mae’s motion to quash, holding that the information was relevant and should be produced. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
The district court denied the motion to quash, and the Second Circuit affirmed. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
In support, he averred that, as of that date, the PSP had not produced the required source code. . . .On October 17, 2013, the government filed a motion to quash the subpoena. . . . [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:53 pm
And in that case, the court denied the defendant’s attempt to quash a subpoena on grounds that: (1) defendant did not have standing for the motion to quash because criminal defendants (in New York at least) do not have standing to quash a subpoena issued to a third party (the court analogized to prior rulings regarding subpoenas to banks); and (2) the defendant didn’t have the right to “intervene” in the action… [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:10 am
No standing to quash third-party subpoena. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:15 am
After a Motion to Quash was denied, Levandowski, Ottomotto, and Uber filed Motions for Relief from the Magistrate’s orders. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:24 pm
State's Motion to Quash Subpoena re: Rodriguez (5/8/07). [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
This matter was before the Court on the Motions to Quash filed by the Defendants. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 10:01 pm
: eDiscovery Best PracticesACEDS Shows Why You Need Those Stinking Badges: eDiscovery TrendsCourt Grants Motion to Quash Subpoena From Defunct Non-Party Entity: eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:01 pm
: eDiscovery TrendsCourt Denies Petitioners’ Motion to Quash, But Also Finds Subpoena Is Not Within Scope of Discovery: eDiscovery Case LawMcDonalds May Soon Know Whether “You Want Fries with That” Before You Even Get There: Data Privacy Trends [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 10:00 pm
Related StoriesThough it was "Switching Horses in Midstream", Court Approves Plaintiff's Predictive Coding Plan - eDiscovery Case LawCourt Sides with Defendant in Dispute over Predictive Coding that Plaintiff Requested - eDiscovery Case LawCourt Denies Plaintiff’s Fallback Request for Meet and Confer after Quashing its Subpoena - eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:00 pm
» Related StoriesCourt Agrees with Plaintiffs, Orders Provision for Qualitative Sampling of Disputed Search Terms: eDiscovery Case LawPlaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoena of Text Messages Granted by Court: eDiscovery Case LawCourt Upholds Review of Taxable Costs by Clerk, Awards over $57,000: eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:01 pm
» Related StoriesNo Bad Faith Means No Sanctions for Failing to Preserve Video of Altercation: eDiscovery Case LawNY Appeals Court Extends Discoverability of Social Media Photos to “Tagged” Photos: eDiscovery Case LawCourt Denies Non-Party’s Request to Quash Subpoena in Telecommunications Dispute: eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:51 am
We therefore reverse the district court’s denial of the Tribe’s motion to quash based on tribal immunity. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:22 pm
Levy, in a preliminary ruling, has held that MediaSentry does not have to respond to the subpoena duces tecum served upon it.May 16, 2008, preliminary order of Hon. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:28 am
The FCC said that because the licensee brought its Motion to Quash under Section 1.334 of the FCC’s Rules, which only applies to subpoenas, and because the LOI is not a subpoena, the Motion to Quash was “procedurally defective” and therefore dismissed it. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
When Preib originally filed his motion to quash the subpoena for certain IDOC recordings he was a third-party defendant to this action. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:56 pm
"If the order stands, Twitter will be put in the untenable position of either providing user communications and account information in response to all subpoenas or attempting to vindicate its users' rights by moving to quash these subpoenas itself—even though Twitter will often know little or nothing about the underlying facts necessary to support their users' argument that the subpoenas may be improper," Twitter's attorneys… [read post]
