Search for: "NIXON v. ROBERTS"
Results 341 - 360
of 436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm
Think of United States v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm
As the appointees of Presidents Nixon, Reagan and George H.W. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:30 am
Legally, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:48 am
The Court next became a major issue in 1924, when the Progressive Party candidate, Wisconsin Senator Robert M. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
Whitman v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
; Roberts v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
So, too, in 1989 the Court appointed John Roberts, currently the Chief Justice, as amicus to defend the judgment below in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
I first heard talk of changing Rule XXII, which required 67 votes to invoke cloture to end a filibuster, to require only 60 votes instead, while I was working at the Nixon White House, but this rule change was not finally accomplished until 1975 after Nixon had departed. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:12 pm
Robert Bork, who died yesterday, left a legacy that includes leading roles in several major events in American legal history—among them, his failed nomination to the Supreme Court in 1987 and his role in Nixon’s “Saturday Night Massacre” as the Watergate scandal unfolded in 1973. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
Nosal and WEC Carolina v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Roberts, Jeffrey S. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm
As an assistant to New York City’s then-Police Commissioner, Patrick V. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
Maybe the best example I can think of is 1974, U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
Perhaps the most egregiously political deviation from precedent since Bush v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:27 am
Senator is calling on conservatives to simply ignore the mandates of Roe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
Herndon, supra; Nixon v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
The CAFC, in Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
Roberts states the doctrine in the one-line form that Chief Justice Rehnquist used in Nixon v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Journalism.co.uk has a report by Marianne Bouchart on the significance of a French defamation case, Clearstream v Robert, which ended at the end of last year – after a ten year legal battle. [read post]
