Search for: "Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company "
Results 341 - 360
of 391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2008, 2:35 pm
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (No. 05-0130) (per curiam), denying the petition for review based on its recent "captive counsel" decision, but leaving open the question of whether an insurer engages in the unauthorized practice of law by employing staff attorneys to represent its affiliates’ insureds. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 1:41 pm
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND SEAN P. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., No. 05‑0130. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 1:42 am
California’s appellate court affirmed, ruling that while policyholders of this mutual insurance company do not have a right to a dividend, State Farm “was obligated to consider from time to time whether dividends should be declared. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 11:01 pm
State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, 277 AD2d 409, 410).Nor is there any merit to plaintiff's contention that she is entitled to recover against Countrywide because it did not timely disclaim coverage. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:57 pm
Liberty Mutual. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Insurance 3 Ben Silver Fuel Outdoor Acquisitions 3 Alex Yaroslavsky Yaro Group, LLC Mediator 3 David Cassese Apex Appraisal Group Appraisal - Residential 2 Paul Wong Concept Realty NY Commercial Broker 1 Sherri Fried RED STONE TITLE & ABSTRACT, LLC Title Insurance 3 AARON KAGAN STUYVESANT HEIGHTS PROPERTIES LLC INVESTOR/OWNER 2 Franklin Burrowes OODA & Co, Inc Investor / Owner 3 Ronald Gold Gold Appraisal Appraiser 2 … [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Richard Coy initially filed his nationwide class action against Country Mutual Insurance Company the week before CAFA was enacted. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:20 am
Co., 1 NY3d at 69-70 [a 48-day delay was unreasonable as a matter of law]; Matter of Nationwide Mut. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 10:51 am
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:52 pm
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, __ N.Y.S.2d __, 2008 WL 1823427 (2nd Dept.), 2008 Slip Op. 03578).Since there is no legal basis upon which the insurer could be liable for coverage, there was no obligation to provide a defense or to indemnify the insured. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 1:34 am
Indeed, as recent circumstances have shown, these valuation issues are present whether a company holds the swap as an investor or as an insurer. [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:51 am
We obtained a similar result for Security Mutual Insurance Company in New York state court in Finley v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 1:16 pm
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (click here and here for prior posts) and Tuepker v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
New York law allows conversion claims involving electronic dataFrost Brown Todd LLC"Plaintiff Louis Thyroff, a former insurance agent for Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, sued Nationwide for conversion in a New York federal court. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:21 am
Nationwide Mutual, a big insurance company, owns all [...] [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. , a 12-page opinion, Judge Mathias writes:At issue in this appeal is whether "other insurance" clauses in the polices of both Nationwide and GuideOne Elite Insurance Company ("GuideOne") are mutually repugnant, requiring each insurer to be liable for a prorated amount of the damages. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 2:01 am
The DOI's press release also states that "American International Group, Inc., Allied Insurance, Nationwide, Allstate Insurance Company, Automobile Club of Southern California, Chubb Group, Farmers Insurance Group, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Group, The Progressive Group of Insurance Companies, Safeco, State Farm Insurance… [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:56 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision in Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:53 am
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (click here and here for previous posts about Leonard), the Fifth Circuit explained that the ACC clearly states that "excluded losses … will not be covered even if a nonexcluded event or peril acts 'concurrently or in any sequence' with the excluded event to cause the loss in question. [read post]
