Search for: "Neal Katyal"
Results 341 - 360
of 746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 1:27 pm
Arguing for Highmark – the defendant below, whose fee award the Federal Circuit overturned – Neal Katyal argued that a “unitary” abuse-of-discretion standard was the only way to make sense of the statute’s limitation of fees to “exceptional” cases. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:23 am
Now there’s an emergency motion for stay pending rehearing en banc, filed by top Supreme Court lawyer and Georgetown law professor Neal Katyal: The merits panel in this case has issued an unprecedented, sweeping injunction directing Google and YouTube to take down a film — “Innocence of Muslims” — across all their platforms and prevent it from being uploaded again. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:00 pm
By Dennis Crouch Octane Fitness v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:17 am
Outside of the Office of the Solicitor General, John Bursch, Paul Clement, Tom Goldstein, and Neal Katyal lead the pack with three arguments each through January. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
At that point, the rest of the argument (including the appearances by Neal Katyal for the trustee Siegel and Sarah Harrington for the Solicitor General) became a lengthy effort, spearheaded for the most part by Justice Kagan, to figure out some way to read the Bankruptcy Code to reach the result so many of the Justices plainly favor. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm
Schumer as Amici Curiae in Support of Amy Unknown Filed by Counsel of Record Neal Kumar Katyal, Jessica L. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:43 pm
The Georgetown Law Journal presented its Volume 102 Symposium, Law in an Age of Disruptive Technology, featuring a keynote address by Professor Neal Katyal, Nov. 8, 2013. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 7:02 am
The Georgetown Law Journal cordially invites you to its Volume 102 Symposium, “Law in an Age of Disruptive Technology”Featuring a Keynote Address by Professor Neal Katyal and panels on:3-D Printing Chaired by Professors Deven Desai and Gerard MaglioccaDriverless Cars & Tort Liability Chaired by Professor Bryant Walker Smith Mass Surveillance Technology Chaired by Professor Christopher Slobogin Friday, Nov. 8, 9 amGewirz Hall, 12th FloorGeorgetown University Law… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
Moderator Neal Katyal will be joined by Paul Hoffman and Kathleen Sullivan, the advocates who argued Kiobel. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm
” Today, that lawyer was former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am
Neal K. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am
Neal K. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:01 pm
For absolutely no articulated reason, she delegated entirely the case to the able hands of Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm
When asked in the courts of appeals what the government’s limiting principle was, Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal offered two “rock-solid” limiting principles: “We agree completely with Lopez and Morrison. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
Nearby is Neal Katyal, who was Acting Solicitor General after Elena Kagan joined the court. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:49 am
Washington Legal Foundation Location: Washington, DC Date: June 25, 2013 Moderator Dick Thornburgh (K&L Gates) will be joined by Eric Grannon (White & Case), Neal Katyal (Hogan Lovells), and Ashley Parrish (King & Spalding). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:07 pm
., Sidley Austin (Carter Phillilps); Wilmer Cutler (Seth Waxman); Bancroft (Paul Clement); Hogan Lovells (Neal Katyal); Kellog Huber (David Frederick); Latham & Watkins (Maureen Mahoney, Greg Garre); Mayer Brown; Jenner & Block; Covington & Burling; Fish & Richardson.California: Land of Natural Wonders... and great appellate practices! [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:45 am
” Coverage of the decision in King comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, and Aaron Kase at Lawyers.com, while at Angry Bear Beverly Mann responds to an op-ed in The New York Times by Akhil Amar and Neal Katyal, who argue that the Court’s decision was correct and that Justice Scalia’s dissent “did not get . . . history quite right. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
In other words, innocent people.Nonetheless, Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Neal Katyal think King was a great decision because it passes the true test of the Fourth Amendment which is ... well, swabbing the DNA of innocent people for a government database is "not unreasonable":On one hand, the swabbing itself is not particularly intrusive — no more so than a fingerprint or a lineup. [read post]
