Search for: "Nelson v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2015, 2:29 am by Ben
” its an area of law fraught with problems (in the UK matters where somewhat clarified by the 'Star Wars' case of Lucasfilms v Ainsworth).Here in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee at Memphis (No. 2:10-cv-02508)  Judge Robert H Cleland  concluded that a cheerleading uniform is not protected without the distinctive stripes, chevrons, zigzags, and colorblocks, and therefore the… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:21 am by Nabiha Syed
Nelson (09-530), considering informational privacy in the context of government background checks; Michigan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Amicus brief of The Eleventh Amendment Movement (TEAM)Amicus brief of Essential InformationReply of petitioners Nelson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
Which might start with a critique of the manner in which Judge O'Scannlain unhelpfully begins his opinion, with a first paragraph that reads (in its entirety): "We are called upon to decide whether an alien may be removed from the United States for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude as determined under federal immigration law. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am by Sean Wajert
United States, 893 P.2d 345 (Nev. 1995); Smith v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Nelson is binding precedent as to petitioners’ constitutional claims. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:15 pm by Bridget Crawford
The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States—a case raising crucial questions of religious freedom law and, most importantly, statutory interpretation. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
The decision was a clear break with the near-unanimous results of federal trial and appeals courts in the wake of the Justices’ ruling last year in United States v. [read post]