Search for: "New Doe Child #1 v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 4:50 pm
” See U.S. v Booth, 111 F.3d 2 (1st Cir. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Nothing new in 2012 letter regarding issue of control. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Agency regulations provide that such sponsors must either be related to the minor or have some “bona fide social relationship” with the child that “existed before” her arrival in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
The claim does not seem ripe. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
The text of the Laken Riley Act would add a new paragraph (1)(E) to the list of those subject to mandatory detention during removal proceedings in INA § 236(c), 8 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
DOE v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
"] From A.M.B. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
Family Court Act Section 756-a was amended by adding a new subdivision (h). [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am
” Since the children resided outside of this State, reference must necessarily be made to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), which provides, inter alia, that “a court of this state has jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination only if: (a) this state is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or was the home state of the… [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Jane gave birth to the child in question and placed it for adoption. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
A recently published decision, Mendoza v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 2:04 pm
§§ 2601-2654 and New Jersey Family Leave Act (“NJFLA”) N.J.S.A. 34:11B-1 et. seq. permits employees to take 12 weeks of protected unpaid leave when they or their immediate family suffer a serious medical condition or for a new born child. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 1:43 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:15 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 5:08 am
At 1 p.m. today, the Court will hear argument in Harbison v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:15 pm
CAAF’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:27 am
Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Montana maintains that the state supreme court’s ruling does not conflict with Citizens United. [read post]
