Search for: "New Haven et al "
Results 341 - 360
of 461
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 2:31 pm
The third, Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:49 pm
In other words, Rosenberg et al. will probably ask the court to order that SAG pay Rosenberg et al.'s attorneys fee for bringing a case that five judges declared moot and that at the end of the day Rosenberg's own attorneys were willing to dismiss! [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:56 am
Hatfield, et al., 2010 WL 1423103 (U.S. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:59 am
Clin Infec Dis. 41:793-794 (2005).[5] Manning SD, et al. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:10 am
I do agree that we need to get rid of useless, repressive, laws and misuse of laws designed specifically to combat terror – but which appear to be being used against the people of our country rather than terrorists – ID, photography, protest, wheelie bins et al. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:53 pm
Thomas Sowell, Markets and Minorities et al. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:17 pm
Employer can avoid disparate-impact liability based evidence that its test was validRicci et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 8:12 pm
The case, Parsons, et. al., vs. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
[et al.], editors.New York : Springer, c2008. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:26 am
The eagerly awaited oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:16 am
The patriotism thing started by David Cameron has descended into a very ‘British farce’ with the Home Secretary weighing in with his comments about Lord Ashcroft’s un-patritotic behaviour only for Eric Pickles et al to lob in those great British patriots who support Labour – Lord Paul, Mittal et al. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:26 pm
The minority firefighters were never parties to the lawsuit nor were the potential claims of violations of Title VII based upon the disparate-treatment and disparate-impact claims to invalidate the test litigated by either the plaintiff firefighter Frank Ricci et. al or the defendant City of New Haven. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Cisco Systems, Inc. et al. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Cisco Systems, Inc. et al. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:25 am
But Cheney et al. had the advantage of the brutish, simplistic conviction that their problem, and their only problem, was to protect the American people from its enemies. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 1:56 pm
The position staked out by Lindsay Graham et al. favoring military commissions over federal criminal trials for the Gitmo detainees we plan to charge with wrongdoing as the “best way to render justice, win this war and protect our nation from a vicious enemy,” is not especially more coherent. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:17 pm
The position staked out by Lindsay Graham et al. favoring military commissions over federal criminal trials for the Gitmo detainees we plan to charge with wrongdoing as the “best way to render justice, win this war and protect our nation from a vicious enemy,” is not especially more coherent. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:10 pm
The ROI of wellness efforts in the workplace is pegged at nearly 300% in a recent Health Affairs article by Karen Baicker et al. and accompanying Health Affairs blog post by Jaan Sidorov - one of my fellow "Health Wonks. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:44 am
Douglas Bremner, M.D., et. al., “Functional Brain Imaging Alterations in Acne Patients Treated With Isotretinoin,” 162 Am. [read post]
