Search for: "New York Times Company v. Sullivan"
Results 341 - 354
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
The California test, which borrows from copyright’s fair-use analysis the consideration of “whether the new work merely supersede[s] the objects of the original creation, or instead adds something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning, or message; it asks, in other words, whether and to what extent the new work is transformative. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
Vitale, prohibiting school prayer, Reynolds v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Sullivan, A Term Limit by any Other Name? [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Tanco’s facility at 10520 Wolcott Drive, Kansas City, Kan., did not have an FRP in place at the time of a May 2009 EPA inspection, in violation of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA), according to an administrative consent agreement and final order filed in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Eby Construction Company, Inc., 620 F.3d 529, 2010.) [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 6:06 am
And Andrew Sullivan. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
New York and Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
”13 Or as the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, put it over a century ago, property “is intended to embrace every species of valuable right and interest and whatever tends in any degree, no matter how small, to deprive one of that right, or interest, deprives him of his property. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Last summer, tech companies followed suit, with CEOs including Elon Musk signing an Open Letter to the United Nations Convention on Certain Chemical Weapons. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:37 am
" Sullivan v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:46 am
On July 11, 2014, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v Loudermilk (here) that the common law of Georgia recognizes the business judgment rule and that the rule has not been superseded by Georgia statutory law. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am
[This defense of Zygna not impressing me, for it is hard to back the valuation of a company that is"selling" imaginary goods. [read post]
