Search for: "New York v. Connecticut"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
In light of Fox Searchlight, employers everywhere – but particularly those in New York, Connecticut and Vermont (within the jurisdiction of the Second Circuit)– should carefully review their internship programs. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:11 am
Connecticut Retirement Plans & Trust Funds and Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:11 am
Connecticut Retirement Plans & Trust Funds and Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:23 pm
For a case out of little Connecticut, the Ricci v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 8:29 pm
Strand, 57 A.D.2d 1033, 395 N.Y.S.2d 254; see, 2 Foster, Freed & Brandes, Law and the Family New York § 4:13 [2d ed.]. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:25 am
New York, and Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:01 pm
One of my favorite posts from today, and probably the week, comes from Daniel Clement of the New York Divorce and Family Law Blog. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm
" Citing the Eastern District of New York's ruling in Hernandez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
Michael Stevens at the Kentucky Law Review does a great round up of posts and materials on Medicaid subrogation in light of Alhorn v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:00 pm
The story (“At trial, Lawyer Claims Former Firm Cut Her Salary Over Pregnancy”) was by Vesselin Mitev of the New York Law Journal. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:06 am
California’s Tax Authority Joins New York’s in Going After Franchisors This posting was written by Bruce S. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Connecticut Then and Now, 8:30 a.m. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 5:15 pm
Ct., Aug. 10, 2016), a Connecticut state trial court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was continually denied access to religious services.In Aiello v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:16 am
A case from neighboring Connecticut may help to fill in at least some of the gaps in New York’s section 608 case law. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The franchise agreement had an arbitration agreement requiring arbitration of disputes in New York under the UNCITRAL Rules. [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:57 am
This case involves, at its core, a trademark dispute between Healix Infusion Therapy, a Texas company, and Helix Health, a New York company. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:46 am
How Aaron Burr changed the Constitution [1] One of the best online introductions to the history behind the Loving case comes from its entry in the Encyclopedia of Virginia, http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Loving_v_Virginia_1967 [2] According to a 2013 online exhibit from the Library of Virginia, there are ten states that never had bans on interracial marriage: Alaska, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,… [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
A particularly compelling argument in this part of the court's analysis was that the legislature had based EIPA upon a Connecticut statute; much of the Connecticut statute was adopted for New York State's version, but Connecticut's provision allowing private actions against banks was intentionally rejected. [read post]
