Search for: "Nicholls v. Nicholls" Results 341 - 360 of 849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2018, 9:12 am by Daniel Hope
Instead, it followed Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1 (“Williams v Roffey”); authority for the principle that a promise to perform an existing obligation could amount to good consideration, provided that there are practical benefits to the promisee. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:04 am
Nichols, 989 F.3d 393, 396 (10th Cir. 1993) ("It is axiomatic that a strip search represents a serious intrusion upon personal rights. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
“Likely” in this context normally means “more likely than not”, though a lesser prospect of success may suffice where the Court needs a short time to consider evidence/argument, or where the adverse consequences of publication might be extremely serious: Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253 [16]-[23] (Lord Nicholls); ABC v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2329 [2019] EMLR 5 [16]. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nichols preferred the 2003 recipe of Ti818, the district court found that Dr. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
Court of Appeals holds that a “residency policy” requiring municipal workers to be domiciled within the geographical boundaries of the jurisdiction serves a "legitimate purpose" Matter of Beck-Nichols, Adrian, and Luchey v Bianco, 2013 NY Slip Op 01015, Court of Appeals These three appeals stem from a residency policy that employees of the School District of the City of Niagara Falls, New York (the District) hired or promoted after the policy's… [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 3:53 pm by Lysander Johnson
The next ferry under construction is M/V SAMISH, due to start service in early 2015. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:28 pm by Legal Talk Network
Thomas Girardi is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame who's commonly known for his work in Anderson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:29 am
After some research in the matter, we believe a tie is not a loss, and Memon, survives another week.See, Bushel’s Case (1670) 124 E.R.1006; Bushel's case;  and Entick v Carrington [1765] 19 Howell's State Trials 1030. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:22 pm by Lauren Kuley
  A seemingly conflicting decision from the Eighth Circuit, United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:29 am by INFORRM
  MGN challenged the decision in Campbell v MGN (No.2) ([2005] 1 WLR 3394) on Article 10 grounds. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The sex offense entries involve the sex offender registration obligations of an overseas resident (Nichols v. [read post]
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35  both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]