Search for: "Noel v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Bloomberg TV has an explainer on Kirby v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:22 am by Moria Miller
Congress is actually reaching out to mandate activity,” Barnett explained.Barnett argued that the scope of President Obama’s health care plan extends “outside the line that the Supreme Court has previously drawn” in cases such U.S v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In the Kansas case, In re Gardiner (2002), the state supreme court held that sex is fixed at birth, and that the marriage between a transgender female, J’Noel, and a man was invalid. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm by Amy Howe
Solicitor General Noel Francisco, went to federal court, arguing that the regulation violates the Constitution. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on April 2, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Bouchart reports: The landmark ruling stated that although the work of journalist Denis Robert contained inaccuracies, the thoroughness of his investigation and the public interest in the story outweighed the defamatory claims. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
Ex Parte Schmieding (12:01 Tuesday) A new model for patent and trademark depository libraries (Director’s Forum) Patent backlog hinders nation’s job creation (PatentlyBIOtech) US patent counts, 2010 (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) 2011 patent reexamination filings continue uptrend (Patents Post-Grant) Avoiding a stay pending patent reexamination: Osmose v Arch Chemicals; Richtek v uPI Semiconductor (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court… [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Douglas Smith looks at Evenwel v. [read post]