Search for: "Norm Pattis"
Results 341 - 360
of 400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2008, 8:54 am
Law blogger Norm Pattis represented the priest on appeal. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 7:43 am
Norm Pattis forgoes closing statements and wonders whether lawyers actually make a difference during trial. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 5:04 pm
Norm Pattis goes to battle, armed with the 4th Amendment. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
Norm Pattis tells a story of the Second Circuit's Clerk's Office losing his briefs. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 4:48 pm
Kalphat (who was represented by the blawgosphere’s own Norm Pattis). [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 12:25 pm
Norm Pattis rejects the concept in favor of advancing his clients' interest (a definitional quibble, in my view; Norm views the term "winning" as part of the sports metaphor of trial that he rejects, but the concept of "winning" isn't really "drawn from sports"); Malum ignores it in favor of filling in the blanks in the government's poorly-written story (a nice way of putting it); Scott and Stephen accept it implicitly (Scott… [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 2:51 am
I'll have a good deal more to say on that a little later today.Until then, here are the contributors to the discussion so far: Malum, Norm Pattis , Stephen Gustitis , Scott Greenfield , and Matlock (thanks to Scott for the links); and here are some of my earlier posts related, generally, to the topic: A Truly Compassionate Profession Redux, Different Sorts of Justice, Who Are You Helping and Who Are You Hurting? [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:43 am
Good to hear via a post from Connecticut civil rights and criminal defense lawyer Norm Pattis that lawyers may not have to 'roll over and play road kill' when, as Norm calls them, the 'geriatric souls' at the bar associations come rattling their swords about you referencing your expertise and experience. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:05 pm
Norm Pattis (Nov. 29) reflects: "I wonder whether Yagman became a Leona Helmsley-type figure. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 6:04 am
Why Norm Pattis won't be voting for John Edwards (Nov. 28)(via Elefant). [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 5:26 am
Posting will be light until Saturday, so here are some links to keep you entertained till I return: Norm Pattis tells us how he would testify before the Judiciary Committee next week. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Thanks to Norm Pattis and Scott Greenfield for posting here and here about the prospective criminal defense client's "Sporting Theory of Trial. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 10:00 pm
Also, JC Bradbury compiles some thoughts from other legal commentators about the Bonds case, and Keith Scherer provides this extensive analysis of the Bonds case; Norm Pattis provides this interesting post that analyzes the probable prison sentence that Bonds is facing, which is far less than those typically reported in the mainstream media. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:11 pm
Norm Pattis makes a couple of nominations from the local crop he sees in Connecticut (Nov. 14). [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 3:13 pm
In a heartbeat, other criminal defense lawyers drew near to weigh in on the subject, including Norm Pattis, who couldn't comprehend that cooperation with the government is wrong, and Scott Greenfield who said he has a position between the two of them.Coming up to seven miles, Steve Bainbridge and I squeezed down energy gels followed by water and Gatorade chasers handed us by some of the many thousands of volunteers helping out. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 10:14 am
Norm Pattis writes about lawyers who won't help people snitch (hat tip to Scott Greenfield); he draws an analogy to the practice of medicine: I would not consider myself well served by my doctor if he were to announce that a life-saving treatment was available, but that he would not prescribe it because, well, it offends his sensibilities. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 4:52 am
Here are a few items from around the blogosphere that deserve Grits readers attention:The Drumbeat of InnocenceCharles Kuffner on Preventing Wrongful Convictions and Exonerating the Innocent, pointing to a liveblog of an event held by the Drum Major Institute.The Ethics of Representing a SnitchAttorneys Mark Bennett and Norm Pattis stake out opposing views, with Scott Greenfield leaning Mark's way while straddling the fence. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:16 pm
Or at least newly mentioned in this space: Connecticut criminal defense lawyer Norm Pattis, of the much-lamented Crime & Federalism, is blogging again at bibliophile.blogs.com; "Need to fire someone? [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
Norm Pattis offers his take on the latest Skakel development. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 10:31 am
Via Norm Pattis, here is a recollection of Connecticut lawyer Catherine Roraback, who represented Estelle Griswold, in the case that became Griswold v. [read post]
