Search for: "North v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 6,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
You don’t want to have Black people or Latinos, or any other identifiable group shut out from opportunities to become United States senators or the president, for example. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am by jonathanturley
Harper, in which North Carolina legislators argued that state courts could not override state legislatures on federal election districts. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm by NARF
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm by Jacquelyn Greene
Youth and Excessive Force Analysis The Supreme Court of the United States established, in Graham v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The United States has the world's largest prison population and one of the world's highest rates of imprisonment. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But it has often played a similar role in historical writing on the United States after the Revolution, and especially in historical writing on federalism. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 10:15 am by Garrett West
United States, 524 U.S. 125, 129 (1998); Japan Whaling Association v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The ET had erred in its approach because it had failed to engage with the question identified in Eweida and Ors v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8; had it done so, it would have concluded that there was a close or direct nexus between her Facebook posts and her protected beliefs. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm by Josh Blackman
And one month later, a cert petition was filed in United States v. [read post]