Search for: "O'Connor v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2020, 7:30 am
Thanks to the forceful dissents by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Clarence Thomas, those—like myself—who favored a narrow interpretation of public use, could no longer be dismissed as extremists or ignoramuses. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
Johnson, invalidating a prosecution for flag burning was:Majority: Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Scalia, KennedyDissent: Rehnquist, White, Stevens, O'Connor And by now, just about everybody accepts Texas v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 12:03 pm
” Id. at *8.Held: “[We] join Justices O’Connor and Breyer [who wrote concurring decisions in Ashcroft v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:48 am
But it's passing strange for anyone who believes in the Sandra Day O'Connor argument that federalism has something to do with "local control" to believe that the state legislature should make the decision instead of Austin. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
Wei Li, Montefiore East Tremont Practice, Off¬Label Medical Device use by Surgeons Public Health Law Session 1E – Room 242Overarching Themes in Public Health LawModerator: Jonathan Todres, Georgia State University College of LawLance Gable, Wayne State University Law School, Public and Private Models of Public Health Governance in Trump’s AmericaLewis Grossman, American University Washington College of Law, The Taming of Progressive ‘State… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
“[G]eneral jurisdiction to adjudicate has in [United States] practice never been based on the plaintiff's relationship to the forum. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:50 am
" Cannistra v O'Connor, McGuinness, Conte, Doyle, Oleson & Collins, 728 N.Y.S.2d 770 (N.Y. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:48 pm
[www.theatlantic.com] Women and the Law March 1970 by Diane Shulder Despite chivalrous claims of protecting the "fairer sex," the law deals more harshly with women than with men [www.theatlantic.com] Justice in the Middle March 1988 By Gene Sperling A profile of Sandra Day O'Connor [www.theatlantic.com] Reefer Madness By Eric Schlosser August 1994 Marijuana has not… [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 9:31 pm
" Still, the clerk allowed that if Souter felt it prudent, concerns over stare decisis would be less severe with "a relatively minor adjustment of Roe," namely, replacing the trimester framework with the "undue burden" standard of regulation that Justice O'Connor had endorsed a decade before; any law that unduly burdened a woman's right to obtain an abortion would be invalid. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:57 pm
One of the most thorough analyses of this issue came in Steve Vladeck's amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:00 pm
Justice Scalia also joins a much more historically based concurrence of Justice Thomas, but it is hard to see how the historical arguments do the work, given that Justice O'Connor, in dissent, marshals strong historical arguments for the contrary result. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:31 pm
These attacks remind me of Justice Scalia's attacks on Justice O'Connor in Webster v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:49 am
Cozen O'Connor Faces Gender Discrimination Lawsuit
The Legal Intelligencer
Cozen O'Connor has been hit with a sex discrimination suit by a lawyer who claims she was ousted from the firm less than a month after she filed a formal complaint of gender discrimination with the firm's director of human resources. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:40 pm
Justice Sottomayor noted the Court’s well established precedent — O’Connor v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 96-100, 110 S.Ct. 1684 (1990); O'Connor v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:31 pm
(After all, Justices Brennan and Souter were more liberal than the Presidents who appointed them, and Justices O'Connor and Kennedy occasionally voted with the "left" wing of the Court on a handful of high-profile issues, including abortion and gay rights.) [read post]
