Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE" Results 341 - 360 of 650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2012, 5:08 am by Richard Renner
Kohn and I are filing a "friend of the court" brief urging the United States Supreme Court to accept review of, and reverse, the First Circuit's decision in Lawson v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:34 am by N. Peter Rasmussen
The court therefore had subject matter jurisdiction and accordingly denied the defendants' motion to dismiss.Leshinsky v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am by William McGrath
He further ordered the prosecutors to review those memoranda and promptly turn over to the defense any material under Brady v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm by Mark Litwak
Study on the impact of State Blue Sky laws on Regulation A offerings.TITLE V--PRIVATE COMPANY FLEXIBILITY AND GROWTHSec. 501. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
Compliance with the auditor attestation requirement of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is not required for the period that a company remains an EGC. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm by James Hamilton
The emerging growth companies would still be required to comply with SEC-mandated quarterly and annual disclosures, but they would be exempted from the auditor attestation provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for a longer transition period, up to five years, instead of the current transition period of two years. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:45 am by Laurent
V Expand the small public offering exemption The JOBS Act increase [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:14 pm by David Zaring
Title V, Private Company Flexibility and Growth. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:20 am by James Hamilton
The Act, however, maintains other investor protections, such as those set forth in Section 501 of the Sarbanes-Oxley, which address potential con [read post]