Search for: "Ohio Fourth District Court of Appeals"
Results 341 - 360
of 683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2010, 6:27 am
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 16, 2010 Evans v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
Ohio. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:36 am
I’ve written before that for years the 8th District has been the most 4th Amendment friendly in Ohio, if not the country. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 12:17 pm
While the district court had decided otherwise based on the facts, everybody applied state law to the underlying question. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
This ruling was affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:16 pm
Supreme Court decided the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:30 pm
District court: Dismissed. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
District court: A jury should decide. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 12:58 pm
But if you're late only because you didn't get notice of the appealable order, the district court can reopen your window to appeal for 14 days. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:44 am
Smith went to trial and was convicted on all charges, after which he appealed his conviction to the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Second District. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
(Fourth Appellate District ruled in favor of Plaintiff Diocese of Los Angeles [175 Cal.App.4th 663, 96 Cal.Rptr.3d 346]; parish decided not to appeal further)10. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Michigan Court of Appeals: Which is not a problem because the Fourth Amendment only protects against police searches, and this was code enforcement. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:42 am
Fourth, rigorous billing judgment should be exercised where multiple counsel are involved. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
The district court dismisses because there is no such thing as a malicious prosecution claim in the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
(Fourth Appellate District ruled in favor of Plaintiff Diocese of Los Angeles [175 Cal.App.4th 663, 96 Cal.Rptr.3d 346]; parish decided not to appeal further)10. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit held that the state’s process violates the NVRA because Ohio uses the failure to vote as the “trigger” for sending voters a confirmation notice. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
(2) Is the district court’s order denying the appellants’ objections to the remedial map appealable under 28 U. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
So it will be interesting to see what the Fourth Circuit does with this on appeal. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
Mitts (Relisted after the 4/15 and 4/22 Conferences) Docket: 10-1000 Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 1:27 pm
Each appeals. [read post]
