Search for: "Other Interested Parties Amended"
Results 341 - 360
of 18,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am
CDA § 230(c)(1) immunizes search engines from most kinds of tort liability for publishing the third-party content of others, while CDA § 230(c)(2) protects their decisions to remove it. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am
CDA § 230(c)(1) immunizes search engines from most kinds of tort liability for publishing the third-party content of others, while CDA § 230(c)(2) protects their decisions to remove it. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 2:41 am
On the other hand, “if the claim merely alleges post-employment breach of a non-compete agreement, and it does not allege that the party used confidential information previously learned to facilitate the breach, then the breach does not arise ‘by reason of’ the party’s position. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:38 pm
” Sandeen Comment: This is a positive development, but obviously it acknowledges that non-parties may be affected by a civil seizure order and be forced to hire an attorney to protect their interests. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:29 am
Before this amendment, only the Competition Bureau and not private parties could seek remedies from the Competition Tribunal or courts for violations of the civil deceptive marketing practices provisions of the Competition Act under Part VII.1 (though private parties could, and still can, commence private damages actions or class actions under the general criminal misleading representation provision of the Act, section 52, and under the other criminal misleading… [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
While none of the parties briefed the issue, the court sua sponte addressed whether plaintiffs had waived their right to appeal the dismissal of claims against one of the prosecutors by failing to name him as a defendant in an amended complaint. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:10 pm
Under principles of constitutional law, a public employee can assert a First Amendment retaliation claim against his or her employer if: the employee suffers an adverse employment action because of the employee’s speech, that speech was on a matter of public concern, the speech was outside the employee’s “official duties,” and a balancing test of certain respective interests favors the employee. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:20 pm
The amendments to Rule 26 also emphasize the need to balance the competing interests at issue in a discovery request to ensure that discovery is proportional to the needs of the case. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:27 am
One of them is that the Fourteenth Amendment proved much more easily adaptable to the interests of business than the Thirteenth Amendment. [read post]
3 May 2010, 4:00 am
I also now make so much money I just lost interest in saving a buck on a can of peas. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 7:24 am
Mark’s claim dealt with the application of the KRS 403.270, recently amended to include a rebuttable presumption that joint custody and equal parenting time is in the child’s best interest. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
(Thus, I am interested in the national party, as opposed to state parties.) [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
In addition, one’s honest statements made to others when expressing one’s internal thoughts were similarly understood to be outside of government authority to regulate at all. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 11:14 am
Rand Paul (R-Ky.) proposed an amendment that would have applied Fourth Amendment protections to any communications held by a third-party, meaning the government could not obtain third-party records without a warrant or individual consent to search (12 affirmative votes). [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 3:29 am
Finding another solution might actually also be in the EPO’s interest, since parties can now choose the forum for pan-European invalidity proceedings between the UPC and the EPO. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:54 pm
Substantial party and amicus briefing has now gone into this second, procedural, issue. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 9:16 am
" Alba lost, but the court did reserve an issue which may prove interesting in the future.Let's begin with why he lost. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
They then obtained another warrant to get records of the other three. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Elizabeth Cady Stanton denounces the Fifteenth Amendment for elevating the interests of “ignorant natives and foreigners” over those of women a few entries ahead of Douglass’s letter cheering the same Amendment. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 10:58 am
The parties agreed on all the relevant facts. [read post]
