Search for: "PETERS v. HOLDER"
Results 341 - 360
of 481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
Holder, in which she argued earlier this Term in support of the federal statute banning “material support” for terrorism. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
: Ex parte Godwin (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Software should be patentable (Patent Fools) (PLI) (PLI) Software method claims: Bilski in light of Benson (Patently-O) [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
In the 1964 case of New York Times v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Study suggests ‘not much (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) Green sunset? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
IAM/Thomson Reuters survey says: EPO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent plutonomies (IPEG) Mandatory disclosure, PCT and WIPO conspiracy theories (Spicy IP) IP for you business: Reducing patent litigation budgets (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Seeking to sell your patent to a big company? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
IAM/Thomson Reuters survey says: EPO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent plutonomies (IPEG) Mandatory disclosure, PCT and WIPO conspiracy theories (Spicy IP) IP for you business: Reducing patent litigation budgets (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Seeking to sell your patent to a big company? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
IAM/Thomson Reuters survey says: EPO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent plutonomies (IPEG) Mandatory disclosure, PCT and WIPO conspiracy theories (Spicy IP) IP for you business: Reducing patent litigation budgets (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Seeking to sell your patent to a big company? [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
During a Senate Hearing, AG Holder said that he won’t prosecute journalis [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Last month, in Kagan v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Arnold, 98 N.Y.2d at 67, 745 N.Y.S.2d 782, 772 N.E.2d 1140; see People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
It has been held that the right holder did not have an obligation to provide URL’s for the content that the platform should remove in its take down request and a simple indication in the title of the video would be sufficient. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Peter Meijer and others introduced the National Security Reforms and Accountability Act (NSRAA). [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
Peter Wentz, testified that the physicians receiving total homocysteine assays from LabCorp carry out the correlating step. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:53 pm
AIG created the opportunity for the possible change of this traditional control.[4] In AFSCME v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Canada US targets Canada over copyright in Special 301 Report (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) (Michael Geist) Federal Court awards $250,000 to Microsoft over sale of two computers with unauthorised copies of Microsoft software: Microsoft v PC Village et al (Excess Copyright) CIRA: Complaint dismissed, costs awarded against… [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am
Contrast that to the Court’s more recent decision in MGM v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
