Search for: "PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT"
Results 341 - 360
of 76,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
The plaintiffs objected to that plan. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 7:10 pm
A New Jersey appellate court found that an employee could not proceed with an intentional tort claim against an employer because the evidence needed to meet the two-prong standard was lacking.Background:- Plaintiff/Employee: Kyle Busby- Defendant: Seabrook Brothers & Sons, Inc. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 2:50 pm
The trial court held that those were the terms to which the parties agreed at the settlement conference, even though plaintiff says the settlement was $100,000 plus fees.That said, were I the trial court, and I had to guess, I suspect that what really happened was that defendant offered $100,000 total, plaintiff (and her lawyers) thought it was $100,000 plus fees, and the parties then "agreed" to that deal -- each thinking different things. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 10:34 am
Brown v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 9:29 am
The Defendants did not appear in this lawsuit. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 5:27 am
From Pines Church v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Scheid v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
NetChoice and NetChoice v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 1:10 pm
In Downey v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:51 am
In June 2024, after an oral hearing in Bulone v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:33 am
Iqbal[x] and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:24 am
& Permanency v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:57 am
A very informative case to consider if you are defending a claim based on that doctrine is one from the Court of Appeals of Georgia, Atlanta Woman’s Club, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:04 am
In Abdou v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 5:25 am
In the case of Donofrio v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:53 am
YC MD, P.C. v Shusterman (___ AD3d ___, 2024 NY Slip Op 03893 [2d Dept July 24, 2024]), is a warning to petitioners / plaintiffs to critically and objectively assess the strength of their claims before embarking upon a legal proceeding under a contract with a prevailing party provision. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:24 am
No. 59) alleges that defendant Ms. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
At issue in Matterport was whether the plaintiff stockholder—following an earlier trial ruling that the defendant corporation had wrongfully (albeit in good faith) prohibited the stockholder from selling his shares—was entitled to damages and, if so, the proper method for computing damages. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
At issue in Matterport was whether the plaintiff stockholder—following an earlier trial ruling that the defendant corporation had wrongfully (albeit in good faith) prohibited the stockholder from selling his shares—was entitled to damages and, if so, the proper method for computing damages. [read post]
