Search for: "PROVIDE COMMERCE, INC."
Results 341 - 360
of 4,018
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2014, 10:38 pm
Omnicare, Inc., a qui tam case brought in Maryland by a former employee of the long-term care pharmacy company, Omnicare. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:00 am
The AP (5/5, Thomas) reports that the Senate Commerce Committee "proposed a major overhaul to the nation's auto safety requirements" that "would force car companies to meet new safety standards and face stiff penalties for failing to report defects," just a week after a similar bill was released by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, "underscoring Congress' intent to bring the first significant reforms to auto safety since the… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 2:42 pm
Defendant Central Coast Agriculture, Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 4:58 am
Mush, Inc. d/b/a Igloo’s Frozen Drinkss, Cancellation No. 92059500 (March 14, 2017 [not precedential].Use of the mark: Respondent provides frozen drink mixes and equipment at several dozen large venues. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 1:01 am
Faber Indus., Inc., 291 F.2d 232, 234-35 (7th Cir.1961). [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:03 pm
The importer had failed to provide necessary documentation to substantiate that the shipment was in compliance with applicable regulations. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:47 pm
Primary Steel, Inc. (1990),Lechmere, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:57 am
The California Chamber of Commerce and the Fix PAGA coalition, representing non-profits, social justice advocates, family farmers, health care providers and businesses, are supporting legislation to reform California’s broken Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 1:58 pm
Power used user-provided social media log-in information to import people’s information to a Power portal. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:09 pm
”The case cite is Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:18 am
I think the dormant commerce clause provides a powerful tool to challenge state computer crime laws that go beyond their federal cousins, at least in some contexts. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:16 am
Ill. 2009) In Shlahtichman v. 1-800 CONTACTS, Inc., the plaintiff purchased contact lenses from the defendant through an Internet transaction with his credit card. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 6:03 pm
§ 2 (2009); see also In re Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., No. 07-0665, 2009 WL 1901635, at *1 (Tex. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Google and Twitter Inc., v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
In UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
Rothschild,[10] the court concluded that NFTs, despite being virtual and intangible, qualified as “goods” within the scope of the Lanham Act.[11] Commerce Use of BAYC Marks by Yuga: Yuga’s utilization of the BAYC Marks in commerce was verified by the Court. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:13 pm
Chanel, Inc. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:58 pm
Leek Associates Inc., and Deibel Labs Inc.) will also be called to testify. [read post]
8 May 2023, 7:10 am
Meenaxi Enter., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 5:24 pm
The general counsel’s research then takes her to Collegesource, Inc. v Academyone, Inc., a recent case in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that applied the four factor likelihood of confusion test for keywords adopted by the Ninth Circuit in Network Automation. [read post]
