Search for: "Palm v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2023, 2:45 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Penalty Kick Management Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 12:55 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Colonial Grocers, Inc., the United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit held that “a[n] arbitration agreement containing provisions that defeat a federal statute’s remedial purpose is still not enforceable. 124 So. 3d 408 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 10:21 pm by Kevin
., “Unlicensed Alien Guide Offered Gall Bladders and Women During Illegal Bear Hunt” (July 27, 2023) and “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018). [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  At 11 a.m., the Court will hear a federal case, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
…It is of course undisputed that plaintiff sold space to Google, but that alone is insufficient to establish that plaintiff used the Klumba mark in United States commerce. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 7:03 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
”  The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Sensormatic Elec. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 5:56 am by Rachel Margolis
When Corporations Are the Criminalizers Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have promoted private-sector investment in Central America on the theory that it will improve standards of living and stem the flow of migrants to the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:39 am
In 2004, Ira Leesfield and Tom Scolaro tried the matter of Kemp v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm by Elin Hofverberg
The decision to make Sweden Protestant was made during the state council (riksråd) in Västerås in 1527. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:25 am by Mavrick Law Firm
For example, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in WeRide Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]