Search for: "Palmer v State"
Results 341 - 360
of 710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 9:21 am
Prior blog post. * Inside Higher Ed: Students lose interest in Yik Yak, a relief for administrators * State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:37 pm
Palmer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:15 am
Palmer v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 8:49 am
., United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Although the Supreme Court held that a state could not simply privatize its public schools and thereby evade Brown’s desegregation mandate (because the schools remained public in key respects), in Palmer v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 10:54 am
Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
Judge Bonapfel – When Are Educational Loans Business Debts For Purposes of Qualifying for Chapter 7?
1 Jun 2022, 6:18 am
In Palmer v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:23 am
The impetus for this law is a Utah federal case, Palmer v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 7:31 am
State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:04 am
” At the Arizona Capitol Times, Christian Palmer considers the consolidated campaign finance cases, Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom PAC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
Palmer, attorney, Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The Dispute in Willingham v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:00 am
The Court held that the documents would not meet the test for the introduction of fresh evidence on appeal, set out in R v Palmer. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 8:56 pm
Kern v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
We agree with the defendant that the evidence at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), was legally insufficient to establish that he acted with the culpable mental state of depraved indifference to human life at the time he collided with the complainants' vehicles and, thus, did not support his conviction of assault in the first degree (see Penal Law § 120.10[3]; People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288;… [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:35 am
For a second day, media outlets are flush with analysis of Monday’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
Cline's attorney, Robert Palmer, who has filed many suits in other states over exposure to toxic chemicals, said all other states have a time limit that begins when a person learns of an illness. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm
This is despite the high threshold for injurious falsehood claims, requiring a plaintiff to prove all of the following elements; a false statement about the plaintiff’s goods or business (falsity); publication of the statement by the defendant to a third party; malice; and actual damage (Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388 [52]). [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 4:52 pm
Three years later in the case of Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
