Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 6,164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, citing Rochester Teachers Assn., 45 PERB 3033, the court sustained PERB's Administrative Law Judge's decision not to order UFT to produce its arbitration statistics as it was consistent with PERB's rules limiting the availability of discovery in improper practice charge disputes [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, citing Rochester Teachers Assn., 45 PERB 3033, the court sustained PERB's Administrative Law Judge's decision not to order UFT to produce its arbitration statistics as it was consistent with PERB's rules limiting the availability of discovery in improper practice charge disputes [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:33 pm by Michael Oykhman
This was supported in precedent in the decision R v Ramzy 2014 ONCJ 30 (CanLii), where, if a public officer was directed by a supervising public officer [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:07 am by Anton Gerber
[8] Opinion of Advocate-General Jacobs of January, 28th 1999, Case C-67/96 – Albany International v Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds, EU:C:1999:28, paras 209-217 [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
It follows the May 2021 ruling of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:09 pm by GWS Law
The case of Isah, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWCA Civ 268 concerned: “the issue of whether a judge is permitted to order costs to be summarily assessed in a different court by a different judge or whether a summary assessment must be undertaken by the judge making the order for summary assessment, whether at the same time or at some point in the future. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by W. Casey Biggerstaff
DoD’s Law of War Manual, § 15.4.2; the current availability of which is contested, see Bothe 28; Davis). [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:40 pm by Bryan West
Furthermore, the Court stated that there was no reason for the breach of contract action to continue being governed by the CLA absent the lien claim.[5]Ibid at para 34. [read post]