Search for: "Park v. United States of America" Results 341 - 360 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2019, 7:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” At The Daily Beast, Ronald Goldfarb argues that the 1967 case United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
  A “covered jurisdiction” could be an entire state, or a county, city or other governmental unit at the local level. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:21 am by ksmcarlson
This is a considerable shift from present practices of the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
United States A new version of KOSA – the Kids Online Safety Act – has been introduced in the Senate. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 5:31 am by SHG
At first blush, this might seem as if it’s just an unfortunate reflection of private ownership, which is what the Minnesota Supreme Court held in State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
Quanta Storage America, Inc. et al (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Claim construction revised in light of plaintiff’s inconsistent arguments during reexam: Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 4:59 am by Patricia Salkin
On appeal, Beaufort County and the United States of America contended the master-in-equity erred in finding the Church’s 1997 development permit applied to the construction of a fellowship hall in 2007, since the permit had expired. [read post]