Search for: "Paul Horwitz"
Results 341 - 360
of 419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2008, 4:34 pm
(It makes me think more generally about Paul Horwitz’s thoughts on special First Amendment treatment for universities.) [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
Leib, Rob Howse, Paul Horwitz, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Steve Vladeck and Orly Lobel.Last Updated: August 24, 2009 - Rank Today: 14http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/Patent Troll Tracker [feed]Tracks patent litigation.Last Updated: February 23, 2008 - Rank Today: 15http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/See alsoBlawg ranking by blawgsearch [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:37 am
This interest stems from a great panel on self-promotion I heard at the Southeastern Association of Law Schools (SEALS) annual meeting this past August, featuring Jennifer Collins (Wake Forest), Erica Hashimoto (Georgia), and this blog's Paul Horwitz (Alabama). [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
Also, there may be some academic freedom issues here (I'll leave that to the Paul Horwitz's of the world), but what I really wonder is if this practice a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) or similar state wage and hour law? [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:07 am
UPDATE: Paul Horwitz's thoughtful post on the same issue is here. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:45 am
The general editors have been a distinguished group, from Paul Freund to Stanley Katz, to now Maeva Marcus. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:42 am
It’s a method of writing and public engagement that I’ve been delighted to see in other humane and highly literate scholars and friends—in Paul Horwitz’s thought, for example (Paul, also a student of Kent’s, offers his remembrances here some of which are similar to mine but some of which are different), and Steve Smith’s work as well, different as these scholars are from one another and, in turn, from Kent. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm
UPDATE: Paul Horwitz has a lengthy post at Prawfsblawg considering the question of whether the last sentence of this post was directed only at libertarians or at everyone who ranks Supreme Court decisions: Does “we” mean libertarians, or everyone? [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 3:50 am
Paul Horwitz provides a lengthy argument as to why this concern for the class of 2020 is misguided, the existence of law as a profession being about clients, not the job prospects of law students. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:48 am
Paul Horwitz of Prawfsblawg suggests that such advocacy blogging (at least by legal academics) is unethical. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 12:17 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Paul Horwitz joins the criticism of Adelman, though expressing a somewhat gentler view than Blackman. [read post]
1 Dec 2018, 9:18 am
In preparing to teach this sequence for the first time (and facing an early deadline for textbook orders), I chose Kermit Hall, Paul Finkelman and James W. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 9:58 am
It does seem quite spread out, and there is certainly a lack of information (see Professor Paul Horwitz’s comment) for candidates.I’m sure there will be opponents to the FRC and prefer the status quo. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:51 am
The most helpful piece, I think, is from Professor Paul Horwitz over at PrawfsBlawg, with this bit I’d like to emphasize:Voicing ex ante concerns about risks is perfectly understandable. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 3:00 pm
Professor Paul Horwitz uses the current controversy as an opportunity to urge greater faculty direction in the selection of articles for publication in law journals, although he also states (and I agree) that that is a longer term project that doesn't justify the one-off after-the-fact decision made here. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 9:58 am
It does seem quite spread out, and there is certainly a lack of information (see Professor Paul Horwitz’s comment) for candidates.I’m sure there will be opponents to the FRC and prefer the status quo. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:48 pm
And we violate it every five seconds.Update: You can find Paul Horwitz's sharp reactions here. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:38 am
” Bob Unruh at World Net Daily also has coverage, while the Volokh Conspiracy’s Eugene Volokh, PrawfsBlawg’s Paul Horwitz, and Slate’s David Weigel offer commentary. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 6:23 am
PrawfsBlawg's Paul Horwitz also has an analysis of the argument, opining that Justice Scalia may be correct in his interpretation that a symbol "can be both particular to a specific religion and meant to honor people of other faiths" but suggesting that the Justice has demonstrated inconsistent views with regard to the Establishment Clause. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am
Writing at PrawfsBlawg, Paul Horwitz considers the possible motivations driving the recent spate of posts on the politics of the individual mandate decision. [read post]
