Search for: "People v Amen"
Results 341 - 360
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
In last week’s case (Harrington v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:37 am
And to that I say “amen. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:06 pm
In connection with the DC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Union of India & Another (1996) 3 SCC 117, the Court held that the judgment order of this court passed under Article 136 is not amenable to judicial review under Article 32 of the Constitution. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:56 pm
If a placebo is chosen that produces a symptom, say dry mouth, the efficacy of antidepressants v. placebos is almost indistinguishable. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Marshall’s tactically shrewd maneuver in Marbury and McCulloch was to insist that the Constitution reduced to written form in a single instrument was particularly part of the realm of law, amenable to judicial supervision, interpretation, and enforcement. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Consequently, the Upper Tribunal would not be amenable to judicial review in cases where “acting within the field ascribed to it, the court perpetrates a legal mistake”. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 29 (21 June 2011) Supreme Court: Upper Tribunal decisions amenable to Judicial Review by Scottish Court of Session if they raise important principle or some other compelling reason to be heard. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:02 am
Part 36 CPR will be amended, to reverse the case of Carver v BAA plc on the issue of what is a more advantageous offer. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
A European practitioner would say "amen" to that. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:44 am
Reading the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Brown v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Forasol v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:49 am
Environmental economists have a couple of theoretical answers—“[c]ompensating [v]ariation” or “[e]quivalent [v]ariation. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:29 am
In Hickcox-Huffman v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:54 am
Carolyn v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
AMEN! [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:11 pm
The third was that she would feel isolated and unsafe in the area: she saw no Pakistani people there. [read post]
