Search for: "People v Ball" Results 341 - 360 of 1,091
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
In its unanimous ruling just last year overturning former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell’s conviction on multiple public corruption charges, the Supreme Court was ultimately swayed not by “tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns” but by the need to tamp down on the potentially unbounded construction of federal law. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am by SHG
It may be that his fast ball has lost its speed over the years. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Google is to remove private medical records from search results after people request action. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, got the ball rolling. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:37 pm by John Hopkins
James, A New, Evidence-Based Estimate of Patients Harms Associated with Hospital Care, Journal of Patient Safety (September 2013); available at: www.documentcloud.org/documents/781687-john-james-a-new-evidence-based-estimate-of.html. v Lakdawalla, Darius N. and Seth A. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:37 pm by John Hopkins
James, A New, Evidence-Based Estimate of Patients Harms Associated with Hospital Care, Journal of Patient Safety (September 2013); available at: www.documentcloud.org/documents/781687-john-james-a-new-evidence-based-estimate-of.html. v Lakdawalla, Darius N. and Seth A. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
There are people sprinkled throughout the free market and libertarian worlds who have that Grove City/Sennholz connection. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
He then walked over to Warner and said, “Nobody is going to tackle Jim,” while flipping him the ball. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
For that group of people, whatever their reasons, I cannot and will not try to persuade them otherwise. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:29 am by Daniel Schwartz
 Another factor to consider is how high up the “chain” in the company the investigation will go; if it involves the people who would otherwise conduct the investigation, it’s best to go outside the company. [read post]