Search for: "People v Bright"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2019, 7:19 pm
Chinese Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in VMI Holland v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
Hartung In the first part of this series posted last week, I discussed the majority and concurring opinions in Athena v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 9:43 am
Zearfoss v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:39 am
” And he continued: “the line between discriminatory purpose and discriminatory impact is not nearly as bright, and perhaps not quite as critical, as the reader of the Court’s opinion might assume. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm
The authors conducted several computations on this specific component of the data, and concluded, …it seems likely that the racial disparity reflects something not merely about the students, but about legal education itself—which may be unsurprising, given the substantial literature on how people of color, and those with less privileged socioeconomic backgrounds, can find law school alienating or a challenging adjustment, to the detriment of their performance. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
In Bunch v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:23 pm
Last week, in Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Enfranchisement of Indigenous people did not fully occur until 1960. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 2:43 pm
Last week, in Rucho v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 10:37 pm
A celebrity bum lift v hard-hitting reality I once watched a Channel 4 news expose on a dodgy letting agent I had been working on. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
WadeandPlanned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Anyway, it’s probably a non-starter of a suggestion, since there are very few if any people in Canada who are sufficiently expert lawyers or economists to fulfill this role and who would not already have too much baggage to carry and still be perceived as credible to all concerned.So, I expect that my fear – shared by others – that this gratuitous statutory references to the “public interest” and a “competitive market” will become an excuse… [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:30 am
Brown v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:38 am
At stake are the fundamental interests of the two peoples, and the prosperity and stability of the world. [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:33 am
In Bartnicki v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:20 am
” See, e.g., People v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 1:34 pm
Vanderhye v. iParadigms, L.L.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
" Tucker v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 1:59 pm
In the recent CBC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:57 am
In 1883, in Pace v. [read post]
