Search for: "People v Challenger"
Results 341 - 360
of 18,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm
" (That's a gang challenge, essentially asking the person if they're with a rival gang.)Step Three: The person, who's not a gang member, accurately responds: "I'm not from nowhere. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:36 am
That's a little bit different.There's also some great doctrinal stuff in the opinion about what you do with mixed-motive Batson challenges, particularly as applied to prospective gay jurors in a case like this one. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm
They were both sentenced to LWOP.A series of legal challenges followed. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 12:54 pm
They fail to show prejudicial evidentiary error, yet appear to assume in their substantial evidence argument that we should disregard the evidence they challenged. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm
” For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/knight-first-amendment-institute-v-trump For information about the lawsuit:https://knightcolumbia.org/content/knight-institute-v-trump-lawsuit-challenging-president-trumps-blocking-critics-twitter Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 11:13 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In King v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:13 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:52 pm
Overview MRN is challenging the MoU on the basis that it breaches privacy and data protection rights and discriminates against vulnerable groups of people. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The committee’s findings may then be appealed to the board.In two separate requests in spring 2023, petitioner Marchitell challenged five books within respondent’s junior/senior school library collection: (1) People Kill People by Ellen Hopkins; (2) It Ends With Us by Colleen Hoover; (3) All Boys Aren’t Blue by George M. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The committee’s findings may then be appealed to the board.In two separate requests in spring 2023, petitioner Marchitell challenged five books within respondent’s junior/senior school library collection: (1) People Kill People by Ellen Hopkins; (2) It Ends With Us by Colleen Hoover; (3) All Boys Aren’t Blue by George M. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:53 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:47 am
People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 7:14 am
Boyles v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 1:25 am
In People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Several justices in previous cases, such as Mitchell v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Yarbrough v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 4:32 am
Most recently, we filed an amicus brief [link] in NY v. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 6:29 am
In People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
We generally -- and purposefully -- give legal changes retrospective (rather than merely prospective) effect in order to incentivize litigants to challenge existing precedent. [read post]
