Search for: "People v High" Results 341 - 360 of 13,354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2020, 2:37 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court in a Texas death penalty/ineffective assistance case, Buck v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:01 am by J
The case was LB Enfield v Phoenix and others, High Ct, March 19, 2013, and seemed to concern the circumstances in which a possession claim can properly be issued in the High Court. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 9:35 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Throughout 2018, new surveillance practices continued to erode the privacy of people in Latin America. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 8:35 pm
Option 3 is the traditional sentence, which in this matter would be the high term of nine years, plus 10 years for the firearm, plus 10 years for the two prior convictions, and three years for the priors under P.C. 667.5, subsection (b). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
  So we're talking about automatic review, over 15 years of delay -- the murder here occurred in over a quarter century ago (in 1983) and the death penalty was imposed in 1996 -- and a very high investment of resources. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
")  A high-profile one.The difference is that it only took ten seconds to identify the actor. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
The Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) v Secretary of State for Justice and G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd  and Serco plc [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) – read judgment Although certain restraining measures had been taken unlawfully against young people in secure training centres for a number of years, the court had no jurisdiction to grant an order that the victims of this activity be identified and advised of their rights. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:30 am by Eric Goldman
GmbH as a Possible Trademark Troll Depiction of Michigan as Hands Doesn’t Preclude Similar Depictions–High Five v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:48 am by Florian Mueller
That makes China a particularly important jurisdiction for any patent dispute with Vivo.IndiaDelhi High Court records show that two Nokia v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 11:37 am by Eric Goldman
” The organization purports to help the education of high risk youths, and it claims that “100% of the net proceeds go to the kids. [read post]