Search for: "People v High"
Results 341 - 360
of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2021, 1:30 pm
If the high court, without a vote of the people, had the right to make this law in 1973, the high court in 2021 has the right to do whatever it chooses with that law. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
Reason and justice prevailed this week in Massachusetts, where the Commonwealth’s highest court ruled by a 5-1 margin in Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:16 am
But it is unnecessary and perhaps could be misinterpreted for the judge to post the decision to these three people. [read post]
29 May 2009, 11:41 am
Which the Court of Appeal explains he wants to get expunged "so he can participate in professional organizations, serve in certain elected positions, and be approved as a registered permanent volunteer at a high school. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
In Regina v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 12:04 pm
For lots of people. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:59 am
On June 23, 2015, in State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:14 pm
In Heim v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:25 am
The trial in the case of Johnny Depp v News Group Newspapers in the High Court in London before Nicol J continued on Friday 15 July (Day 9), Monday 20 July (Day 10) and Tuesday 21 July (Day 11). [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:35 pm
The jury rejected his entrapment defense, and that's a very high barrier to reversal. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 6:04 am
People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
High times at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service [Luke Rosiak, Examiner via Jim Harper, Cato] 6th Circuit: In ruling company’s suit against union to be unfair labor practice, NLRB breezed past First Amendment issues [NLRB v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:21 am
Luckily this matter was recently brought to the Australian High Court, which ultimately decided the fate of foreign marks in Australia, and whether they can inherently distinguish the goods or services provided.The case in question was Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Modena Trading Pty Ltd, which dealt with the ever-loved subject matter of coffee. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 5:53 am
And 75(v) cannot be taken away. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 9:04 am
Newsom v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am
Joseph V. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:43 am
Mabry v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:01 am
The case was LB Enfield v Phoenix and others, High Ct, March 19, 2013, and seemed to concern the circumstances in which a possession claim can properly be issued in the High Court. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:01 am
The case was LB Enfield v Phoenix and others, High Ct, March 19, 2013, and seemed to concern the circumstances in which a possession claim can properly be issued in the High Court. [read post]
