Search for: "People v J."
Results 341 - 360
of 7,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
Not least because I get to use the word 'Snook' without people pointing at me and laughing. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
Not least because I get to use the word 'Snook' without people pointing at me and laughing. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm
“Yesterday, open statements were heard in the case of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
(Marshall, J.) [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
You cannot expect to utilise AI in your products or services without considering privacy, data protection and how you will safeguard people’s rights. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:08 pm
Mann J stressed this factor in his decision in Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) that the defendant should compensate Sir Cliff Richard for broadcasting footage of a police search of his London flat (taken from outside the property). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:21 am
People v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
On 26 April 2021, Nicklin J heard the last day of the Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon trial. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 9:32 am
Here is the abstract: Underlying Rand J's judgment in Roncarelli v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:39 pm
Susan V. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Joseph FishkinMost writers and scholars (perhaps most people in general?) [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
Matthew J. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On 1 February 2024, Steyn J dismissed the application to amend the Claim Form and struck out the existing claim in Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd [2024] EWHC 173 (KB). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
Bean J doubted whether that decision was correct: “I can see no policy reason to extend qualified privilege to people who believe they are about to be criticised and decide to get their public retaliation in first. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am
has a bunch of New York people at a cocktail party, and the balloon for each of them simply says “Real Estate. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 4:48 pm
Ritchie J then addressed the Supreme Court’s decision in PJS v News Group [2016] UKSC 26, reiterating that the starting point is that there is not, without other factors being present, any public interest in the disclosure or publication of purely private sexual encounters. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm
Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P, Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Desporte v Bull, heard 9 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Spicer v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard 1 to 5 February 2021… [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm
Singleton, Slip Op. 49 (Earls, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1615, 1619 (2021) (Sotomayor, J.); Barton v. [read post]
