Search for: "People v Jacobs"
Results 341 - 360
of 697
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
The law isn’t limited to people who are in prison or on probation (whose First Amendment rights are sharply reduced because of that); it applies even to people who had finished serving their sentences. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:15 am
There is no such evidence in this case.The case is Myers v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am
The United Nations announced on Sunday that so far this year, fighting in Afghanistan has killed or wounded 2,000 civilians and left more than 80,000 people displaced. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
In this segment, attorney Jacob J. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 11:08 am
Earlier this week, in Evenwel v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
–Duguid v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
–Duguid v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 9:23 am
IP and Other Things: A Collection of Essays and Speeches by Robin Jacob is published by Hart Publishing (Bloomsbury). [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
H/T Jacob Sullum at Reason Copyright © 2007-2016 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:33 am
In this segment, attorney Jacob J. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:58 am
Thursday The Court is not sitting today, but judgment is being handed down in the joined criminal cases R v Jogee and R v Ruddock. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Bell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am
One would think that Shields has a good case that the uses constitute "fair use" - not least from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Bill Graham Archives v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
” Gottlieb v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am
The Information Commissioner has reaffirmed the need for stronger sentencing powers for people convicted of stealing personal data. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 5:24 am
The underlying case, Husain v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
Jacobs, 38 Misc. 781, 78 N.Y.S. 833; People ex rel. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
Fortunately this particular matter has been considered and largely rejected by the UK courts (see Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2001] EWHC/Ch/25 ) As mentioned, there is quite a bit of case law on the public interest issue, and those interested in it may find it helpful to read a summary by Jacob J(as he then was) in his first instance hearing of Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland case (see paras [24-34]). [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:54 am
That's the rule in Garcetti v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Jacob J. [read post]
