Search for: "People v Jones (John)"
Results 341 - 360
of 483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2023, 10:15 am
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
I hear them in the voice of my Constitutional Law professor, Robert Bork, and in the words of John Hart Ely, whose scholarly elaboration of the logic of Footnote Four in Democracy and Distrust posed the most cogent challenge to the Court’s expansive constitutional decisions in the realm of reproductive autonomy. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:50 pm
But 2008 certainly saw some asinine entries, including putative Cyberlawyer Eric Menhart's claim to own a trademark in the term "Cyberlaw," Jones Day's efforts to claim that a web page referencing its name as the employer of some homebuyers violated its trademark rights, and putative Cyberlawyer John Dozier's claim that if his name is used as anchor text, the link must go to his website or it violates his trademark right [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:48 pm
"Citing Jones v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 8:54 am
Cyprus v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Supreme Court held in Gregg v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:16 am
’” In making that finding, Mehta had quoted the Supreme Court’s strict test for incitement in the landmark case of Brandenberg v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am
Jones. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
In other news, the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 2:50 am
On 8 October, 14 US Attorney Generals filed separate lawsuits against TikTok for harming the mental health of young people. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Justices Felix Frankfurter and John Marshall Harlan, who were very historically minded, opposed incorporation on that ground. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am
Where the court made no such finding here, and instead, improperly delegated the parenting time determination to the father, the error required reversalIn Matter of C.M. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 7:20 am
In Texas v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
Happy people just don’t shoot their husbands. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm
Massachusetts in 1944 to Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
This led to an occupation of the site by members of the tribe, with 222 people eventually evicted by police after 506 days. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
However, occasionally judges simply reject Section 230 because they don’t like it (this year’s crop include Jones v. [read post]
