Search for: "People v Manning" Results 341 - 360 of 8,211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2023, 2:32 pm by Lee E. Berlik
An unconscionable contract is “one that no man in his senses and not under a delusion would make, on the one hand, and as no fair man would accept, on the other. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:02 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Attorneys fighting for victims of decades-old child sexual abuse, the March 2023 Third District Court of Appeals’ ruling in Doe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:05 am by Valerie Oosterveld
Since the Al Hassan case, persecution on grounds of gender has been charged in Prosecutor v Said and Prosecutor v Abd-Al-Rahman. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” (Jackson himself called Thomas “Uncle Clarence” after the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
IPSO 12126-22 Nash, Waugh and The Lighthouse Group v The Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2023), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09772-23 Peet v Sunday People, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 14431-23 Resolution Statement Booley v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 16942-23 Hood v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1… [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And by the way, we agree with Will Baude that it's hard to see how people ever have standing to sue for nominal damages. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
At the Atlantic, Adam Serwer critiques Justice Thomas's analysis of the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause in the Court's Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:34 am by Jon Hyman
Geiger doesn't like transgender people and is using her religion and the Supreme Court's decision in 303 Creative v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am by Frank Cranmer
: on two significant decisions on the legal recognition of same-sex couples: Buhuceanu and Others v Romania and Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
" Smith has a "sincerely held religious conviction" that "marriage is a union between one man and one woman," and she "will not produce content that contradicts biblical truth. [read post]