Search for: "People v Miranda"
Results 341 - 360
of 906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217, 226 (Tex. 2004). [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 8:44 am
Brown v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
Maybe it’s not as big a deal as Ernesto Miranda or Clarence Earl Gideon, but it’s no small shakes either. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
One of the most intriguing cases on the Supreme Court’s docket this fall is Foster v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
” What made this case difficult was that the Supreme Court had said repeatedly in the years that followed its decision in Miranda v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:26 am
#poor people's lives matter.*) So a quarter century it was. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
Miranda. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
After Mapp, when people denounced the practice of letting criminals off on "technicalities," this was usually what they meant. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 10:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm
" (People v Williams, 2015 NY Slip Op 02866 [4/7/15]) Thus, if a defendant waives Miranda, speaks to police about rape accusations, but refused to answer whether he had sex with the complainant, his refusal to answer could not be used to imply consciousness of guilt (the prosecution said the defendant "did not deny" having sex with the complainant) or to cast doubt on his other statements about the incident. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:56 am
It is the result of the famous 1996 Supreme Court case of Miranda v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 5:53 am
In the case of Howes v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
” When my U.S. history class studied Miranda v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:12 am
A somewhat recent Supreme Court case, J.D.B. v North Carolina, however, found that police must consider the child’s age in determining whether or not the child is in custody for Miranda purposes; previous cases had rejected consideration of age as part of the “custody reasonable person standard. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:19 pm
We have held several American citizens for a multiple period of years as enemy combatants … Before I vote on your nomination, I want you to read Hamdi v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:58 pm
” That happens because people don’t understand Miranda. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
V, VI, IX, and XIV,NJ Constitution 1, paras.1, 10, and 2], and requirements stated in Miranda v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
All Mapp v. [read post]
