Search for: "People v Parker"
Results 341 - 360
of 540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2017, 9:27 am
The case is Maslenjak v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 11:41 am
One such case was the 2018 case Stevens v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:07 am
There was a problem with this arrest: 18 years earlier, the New York Court of Appeals struck down this law as unconstitutional, in People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am
Parker and State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
And for those who doubt the existence of karma, it came back to him the next day, when the United States Supreme Court affirmed his decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
Parker, 118 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1960); Section 440.34, Florida Statutes. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
Parker, 118 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1960); Section 440.34, Florida Statutes.) [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:54 am
In this case, an age discrimination case is revived because there was pretext all over the place, along with some ageist jokes.The case is O'Reilly v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
The law of what people are allowed to do with their drones in the vicinity of other people’s property is undeveloped and the Counterclaim raises reasonable issues in this regard. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:40 am
" The Innocence Project of Florida (IPF) is a 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to finding and freeing innocent people in Florida prisons. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Statement of Facts: State of Florida v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:00 am
" Well, now that is happening, in a case called Ekren v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:27 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Flowers v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 6:49 am
As demonstrated in Kaplan v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 4:00 am
In the words of my fellow graduating classmates, Casey Caines and Scott Parker, in order “for us to reconcile Canada’s dark history, everyone has to be involved. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:18 am
If there is an IP licence, a liquidator might describe it as an onerous licence and disclaim it [says the IPKat, on a recent dispute involving this area, see Butters v BBC here]. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
A glorious day for Disability Advocates.The case is Disability Advocates, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm
This is the odd question addressed in the Supreme Court's decision in Parker v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Maine People's Alliance -- scope of citizens' rights to force a cleanup of hazardous wastes. 06-1543, Saouvong v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
Dixon and the Cowan v. [read post]
