Search for: "People v. Charles" Results 341 - 360 of 1,917
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by admin
  The trend continues with the case of Janus v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: The Belloni Decision: A Foundation for the Northwest Fisheries Cases, the National Tribal Sovereignty Movement, and an Understanding of the Rule of Law Charles Wilkinson Judge Belloni’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am by Stephen Griffin
  After all, in the wake of the Civil War the people who were most determined to assert legal continuity were former Confederates, not radical Republicans. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 6:59 am by Andrew Koppelman
Rev. 197, 235 (1994), quoting Charles L. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Press 2008); Charles Lane, The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction (Henry Holt & Company 2008); and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Charles BarzunIn the last Part of this series, I suggested that the essential nugget at the heart of “living constitutionalism” is the idea that part of what grounds the constitution’s authority for us is its capacity to adapt (i.e., to respond appropriately) to changing circumstances. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
June 12th is Loving Day, a holiday celebrating the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
Charles Barzun is the Horace W. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am by Shannon O'Hare
France has been hit by an unprecedented economic crisis as a result of COVID-19, with its GDP contracting by 6 per cent in the first quarter of 2020. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” In an analysis for The Washington Post (subscription required) of their recent research, Guy-Uriel Charles and Luis Fuentes-Rohwer write that “the real culprit” in Wisconsin’s recent election that required people to show up at the polls during a public health emergency “is the Supreme Court’s 2018 political gerrymandering decision in Rucho v. [read post]