Search for: "People v. Cole" Results 341 - 360 of 448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
. “Identifiable” material would be treated differently from “non-identifiable” content, with the aspiration “that, over time, people will pay less attention to and take less notice of material which is anonymous”. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am by Heather Green, University of Aberdeen
He pointed the justices to a sentence in McLean and Cole v UK ((2013) 57 EHRR SE8; again see my previous post) that could be read as indicating the Strasbourg Court’s willingness to countenance some referendums as falling within the scope of A3P1. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 am by imlablog
Courtesy http://www.change.org/photos/wordpress_copies/cow.jpg Posted By: Dwight Merriam, Partner, Robinson & Cole, LLP A couple of weeks ago, the South Dakota Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:27 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In 2001, just months after Perry's ascension to Governor, the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:23 am by Steve Hall
"The implications of this for the Texas justice system are probably larger than people realize. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  The Guardian reported that “Sunday People ‘hired detectives to target Milly Dowler phone” whereas Bloomberg went for the Royal angle with a piece entitled “Prince Harry Seeks Investigator Receipts in Phone Hacking Case“. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Jim is leaving to run the managed assigned council program in Lubbock, but leaves behind a significant reform legacy which includes his work on the Timothy Cole Advisory Panel on Wrongful Convictions, the expansion of public defender offices in Texas, and experimentation with various indigent defense delivery models including a client-choice model in Comal County. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
[xxiv] More than 11,000 people contributed over $150 million to the organization. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Feyziyev v Radu was listed before Whipple J on the same day but the matter has settled. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Chambers (1983) 463 U.S. 783; County of Allegheny v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
 It might well convey to the world that the American legislature views military detention as an unremarkable, even preferred, option in some terrorism cases, thereby blurring the important message the President has been endeavoring to convey, through word and practice, that “[t]he strong preference of this Administration is to accomplish [incapacitation of persons who are threats to the American people] through prosecution. [read post]