Search for: "People v. Commons"
Results 341 - 360
of 14,072
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 2:24 pm
It is more common for two people to own property in a joint tenancy, for example two spouses, than for there to be three or four joint owners, but the principle applies whatever the number. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:02 pm
In People v Syville (_NY3d_, 2010 NY Slip Op 07249 [10/14/10])the Court of Appeals held that "[w]here an attorney has failed to comply with a timely request for the filing of a notice of appeal and the defendant alleges that the omission could not reasonably have been discovered within the one-year period, the time limit imposed in CPL 460.30 should not categorically bar an appellate court from considering that defendant's application to pursue an untimely appeal. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
Instead, they asserted common law privacy, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment claims. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
Regardless of how the dispute plays out, I guess it illustrates that when interacting online, people need to keep common sense at the forefront. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:16 am
Nearly 30 million people board cruises each year. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:00 am
In Jones, Clarke extended this view to assert that enslaved people retained all of their common law rights that statutes did not explicitly deny to them. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:09 pm
Traditional “Common Law” Categories of People Coming Onto Land And The Duty of the Landlord to Those Entrants American Tort Law has always required landowners or lessees to protect people coming onto their property to some degree or another. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 7:20 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:56 am
Consequences of Worley v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 5:11 pm
In the significant New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Murray v Wishart ([2014] NZCA 461) the judges unanimously ruled that a third party publisher (the owner of a Facebook page that contained comments by others) was not liable for other people’s comments simply because he “ought to have known” that they contain defamatory material (even if he didn’t actually know of the content of the comments). [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
(People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 2:32 pm
In LaFace v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
MayweatherTale of the Tape - PacMan v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 2:50 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:45 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
When Ed Blum brought Evenwel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
When Ed Blum brought Evenwel v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:19 am
The Ninth Circuit decision in Gordon v. [read post]
