Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 341 - 360 of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 3:16 am by SHG
We note, however, that such questions were improper (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932; People v Paul, 212 AD2d 1020, 1021, lv denied 85 NY2d 912; People v Edwards, 167 AD2d 864, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:06 am by Stephen Bilkis
  While several witnesses testified that the defendant was at the scene, on cross examination, the witness statements were not consistent. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:51 am
You can't banish people, even as a condition of probation. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 9:20 am
So, for example, if I go to the CanLII report of the Johnson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 9:09 pm
:We also find reversible error in the trial court's almost continuous interference, during cross examination of the People's witnesses, in defense counsel's exploration of issues relevant to defendant's intent to sell (see People v Canto, 31 AD3d 312 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 900 [2006]; People v Melendez, 31 AD3d 186 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 927 [2006]; People v Retamozzo, 25 AD3d 73 [2005]; People… [read post]