Search for: "People v. Dawn"
Results 341 - 360
of 373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2009, 1:22 am
Then they see clips of Susan Boyle on YouTube accumulating 100 million views, and it dawns on them. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Kenya’s anti-counterfeit legislation, India protest (Afro-IP) Cepham – US: CAFC: Another ‘bright-line’ rule from the Federal Circuit; double jeopardy – later developments can overcome double patenting: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) General… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
Rev. 480 (1990), has been cited for the proposition that the brief that Dawn Johnsen wrote in Webster v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:57 am
Rev. 480 (1990), has been cited for the proposition that the brief that Dawn Johnsen wrote in Webster v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 4:23 pm
It just dawned on me and David one day that, like you said, everyone knew of Marbury v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 3:10 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 8:12 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Castellano, 41 AD3d 184, 185; People v Carter, 40 AD3d 1310, 1312). [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 8:17 am
He appeared in, among other things, the landmark Supreme Court case of National Textile Workers v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Webb v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:32 am
At the dawn of the Internet age, courts were forced to confront the issue of sharing copyrighted works over electronic networks. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:54 am
In Tate v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:01 am
" The problem was that most marketing people had no experience with developing web sites for lawyers. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:24 pm
In Illinois v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 5:19 am
See Desert Palace, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:09 pm
It's been a few days since Geoffrey Hobbs QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, handed down his decision in Whirlpool v Kenwood. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 10:05 am
As posted here, his test case ended when the Supreme Court held 8-1 in Plessy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 9:44 am
That means a government controlled by the people themselves. [read post]
