Search for: "People v. Fears" Results 341 - 360 of 6,102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
The transaction raised eyebrows due to Sun’s ties to the CCP and his former military service with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:47 am by SHG
  *As explained by Hans Bader: For example, in Stair v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
Although at least 15 people have been sentenced for seditious conspiracy since the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
A week ago, he said that he was mulling the possibility but he quickly added that he was unpersuaded (thus far) because his decision to do so would be “litigated,” and the President’s advisors reportedly saw “it as a poor option overall, fearing such a move would trigger a pitched legal battle. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:09 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
People who believe that their employers have engaged in illegal or unethical behavior should be able to come forward without fear of losing their jobs or facing other forms of retaliation. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am by Sabina Henneberg
The Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, which seeks to measure democracy globally, identified eight countries in 2022 that “bounced back” from authoritarianism after having previously made democratic gains. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]