Search for: "People v. Fisher"
Results 341 - 360
of 635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 7:00 am
P 71,201 Fisher v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 2:18 pm
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision soon in Fisher v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Answer: I’m sure there will be people who disagree, but the answer is “yes. [read post]
10 May 2013, 12:42 pm
It may well be -- as the Court of Appeal holds -- that a criminal court doesn't have the statutory power to enter a restraining order in an extortion case, unlike some other criminal cases (e.g., stalking, domestic violence, etc.).However, if that's indeed the case, the law should be changed.Defendant tries to extort a job from someone by threatening him. [read post]
3 May 2013, 8:44 am
Many people believed that the legislature’s amendments to the Wage Payment and Collection Act in 2007 had excluded PTO from payment upon termination. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm
Under the principle in Derbyshire v Times Newspapers, public bodies cannot sue for libel. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm
A week ago today, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Texas case called Salinas v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm
A week ago today, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Texas case called Salinas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:34 am
SCOTUSblog tells us, after live-blogging the announcement of Moncrieffe v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as was confirmed by the oral argument last October in the still-pending case of Fisher v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:12 pm
” While Fisher v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:03 pm
And a Court whose majority is deeply skeptical of affirmative action measures to begin with (see the recent oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
During the oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
He discusses those views and Fisher v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 6:51 am
” Fisher v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:33 pm
Holder with Fisher v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am
Sidhu raises two concerns with the “critical mass” argument invoked to justify the affirmative action program under challenge in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 8:57 pm
In short, if, for God knows what reason, the Supreme Court justices are sitting in Washington, taking a break from working on their opinions in the Fisher case to read the blog arguments in favor of affirmative action in law review article selection, shouldn't they conclude that Grutter v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 12:32 am
The distinction is illustrated in Fred Fisher, Inc. v. [read post]
