Search for: "People v. Harper"
Results 341 - 360
of 367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 4:59 pm
Take two recent cases, that of Aaron Banks defamation case against the journalist, Carole Cadwalladr, and the actions brought by a number of wealthy Russians against the author, Catherine Belton, and the publisher Harper Collins over allegations in Belton’s book, Putin’s People. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:02 am
When selling a public good, however, it is best to acknowledge your allegiance to "the people. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
And Gundy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
New York: Harper and Row, 1970. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
New York: Harper and Row, 1970. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:18 am
Private Members Bills usually go no where, but the majority Harper government has been using them to backdoor controversial Bills, since they require less debate in Parliament. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:39 am
Justice Ian Binnie, who wrote the Theberge majority, had retired from the court and two new Harper appointees, Justices Moldaver and Karakatsanis had just joined. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:46 am
The House of Commons debate criticised the claims brought against Harper Collins and Catherine Belton over her book Putin’s People, including that brought by Roman Abramovich who contended that Belton’s book contained defamatory allegations going to corruption in the context of his alleged links to the Russian government. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
Harper, COA23-206, ___ N.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
”[15] Shareholders are people too, however, and so one can argue that the permissive scope of corporate fiduciary duties should allow for the adoption of climate-friendly policies if they generally enhance shareholder “welfare” rather than profits.[16] Also, there is wiggle room in arguments favoring the “long-term” interests of shareholders, though future generations of not-yet-existing “shadow shareholders” are unlikely to be included.[17]… [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Most people see the negotiations as an implicit concession that the material is protected by copyright (or by some other type of intellectual property). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
R. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
People queued and camped to get their hands on these devices. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
I admit that I'm no expert in the doctrine in this area, though I do watch it out of the corner of my eye, and I can't recall reading a more ridiculous standing decision in the last 10 years or so than the one the Court endorsed in the 303 Creative v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
See Katzenbach v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
In this way, LSUC embellishes its appearance of an adequate response to the problem, but those young people do not gain what only a law society-sponsored solution to the problem can give them, which is a financially adequate and stable career, with a high probability of an adequate return on the large investment necessary to obtain a law degree and “call to the bar. [read post]
