Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 341 - 360
of 554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 11:05 am
LinkedInFacebook v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
Surveillance On 30 January 2023, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found MI5 agents “unlawfully retained people’s intercepted data,” via the use of surveillance warrants from 2014-2019, Liberty and Privacy International v Security Service [2023] UKIPTrib1. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm
., State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 2:32 am
My friend and former Dean Ward Farnsworth, writing after (and about) Bush v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm
For instance, he might set a criminal free for a reason which has nothing to do with the reliability of the evidence or the justice of the case.Orin Kerr at VC has this post on United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
But it is not the issue before this court Comment “But they haven’t done an equality impact assessment” is a fairly common complaint, although even that can be of less use to a challenge than people think; see, for instance, R(Brown) v SSWP [2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin) and R(Meany) v Harlow DC [2009] EWHC 559 (Admin). [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
The case, Utah v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am
Lord Kerr would have dismissed the appeal. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am
Listed for two days from this morning in Courtroom 2 is the appeal of Barnes (as former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group & Anor, to be heard by L Hale, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Hughes and L Toulson. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 9:39 am
David NosalFacebook v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr (massively paraphrased): but has Parliament has not given citizens of the UK rights by way of the 1972 Act, and therefore would have to be consulted in order for them to be taken away? [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:04 am
” This conclusion was reaffirmed by the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:14 am
But the opening of Judge Korman’s opinion in Abidor v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
Glossip v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage in that action too intensively and for too… [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:06 pm
The conclusion reached in the case of Ligue Contre Le Racisme v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 5:04 am
If you really cared about the law and the Supreme Court, you would know that he won Dunaway v New York, 442 US 200 [1979] at 29. [read post]
