Search for: "People v. Knight" Results 341 - 360 of 581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2009, 4:38 pm by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
However, that will not stop the concerns that people have. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 10:42 am by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
  Real parties Henry Ruhnke, Thomas John McDowell and Victoria Knight McDowell Charitable Remainder Unitrust, and Thomas John McDowell and Victoria Knight McDowell, trustees, filed their application for a conditional use permit (CUP) for the project in 2021. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
 The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University filed an amicus curiae brief with the US Supreme Court in Moody v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
A judge has barred journalists from naming four people mounting a fresh High Court Brexit challenge in reports on the case. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:43 am
In the emails, [Thompson] used the names Earl Thompson, Mystery Knight, Knights Elite, Saucy Jack, Black Jack, and Jack Porns. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
The people in these Italian mountain communities put NO food garbage into their dumps! [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
 The Knight First Amendment Institute posted a blog discussing the amicus brief it filed in Twitter v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:20 am
The England v Kenya cricket game is about to begin. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am by Eric Goldman
I’ve written this in preparation for the Supreme Court appeal in NetChoice v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am by SHG
Knights, 534 U.S. 112, 118–19 (2001) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]