Search for: "People v. More"
Results 341 - 360
of 43,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2009, 4:11 am
With the recent emergence of high profile cases such as Nokia v iPhone, this could see patent cases in the mobile phone industry for some time to come. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 12:08 pm
Some are more thoughtful than others. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
Some people are happy with short, concise opinions that read (to me) more as advocacy summaries than as opinions; others take a contrary view. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 12:57 pm
To be more precise: Does a B.B. gun qualify as a "deadly weapon" pursuant to the definition of that term in California's statute relating to assaults with a deadly weapon, which say that an item qualifies if it is "any object, instrument or weapon that is used in such a manner as to be capable of producing and likely to produce, death or great bodily injury"? [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:37 am
The result potentially being that you have four more years in which to complain about your surroundings.You might want to have thought about that same principle, by the way, when you refused to leave your home after it was foreclosed upon. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:14 am
And the California Supreme Court will unanimously affirm.Even more so if the key witness tells the jury that the police officer was "really nice," and not like other officers who are mean or sarcastic.Being a police officer is a tough job. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
Presumably for more than your sparkling personality.Oh, and it's admittedly not a separate criminal offense to say "It's none of your f***ing business what I do to my girl. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:38 pm
Paying far more than $1000 on attorney's fees. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:36 am
More celebration for Villanueva! [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 10:33 am
Ford v Ferrari is a glorious throwback to the era when big stars did quality movies about actual people with real-life problems, but the scripts nevertheless adhered to basic Hollywood formulae such as “Have an exciting climax. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 3:14 pm
"As I was saying, at first glance, there seems a lot right about that conclusion.But the more I thought about it, the more I thought that it's wrong. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:41 pm
"Proof positive that the more things change (in the law and otherwise), the more they stay the same.The Court of Appeal reverses the conviction on the ground that Mr. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:39 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 11:57 am
Supreme Court held in Powell v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:06 am
As a follow up to my tongue-in-cheek post last Friday about language from judicial opinions I want to mention something that's bothered me for a while now, and see if people think I'm being over-sensitive: the jocular riffing on Justice Holmes's "Three generations of imbeciles is enough" language from Buck v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm
But what about more difficult cases? [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 1:07 pm
Clifford and Tyler on fire scene searches do not distinguish between protection of people and property. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:45 pm
Who's famous for wrangling about what "is" means.But, in this case, the linguistic dispute is far more meaningful. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:34 pm
Really, I do.But I'll offer the following rule, which although not categorical, is at least subject to a very heavy presumption:If you have more than 50 animals as pets, you're doing something wrong.I make this observation after reading this case. [read post]
