Search for: "People v. Nails" Results 341 - 360 of 546
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2012, 10:56 am by Erik J. Heels
The Oatmeal: Why Nikola Tesla Was The Greatest Geek Who Ever Lived (2012-05-14) Nailed it. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:56 am
  “strength in weakness” is an overly simplistic explanation: Judith embodies (in political terms) “the people v. tyranny”, (in feminist terms) ”righteous woman vs. marauding man” and (in County Music terms) “git-er done gal v. skunk-drunk asshole. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:55 am by SHG
There is no lack of things to find abhorrent with New York City's stop and frisk policy, which is on target to nail more than 700,000 people this year, having fallen just shy last year. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Since 2010, the beauty and cosmetic business was afire with the news that the “Brazilian Blowout” hair treatment released the known carcinogen formaldehyde when used. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Since 2010, the beauty and cosmetic business was afire with the news that the “Brazilian Blowout” hair treatment released the known carcinogen formaldehyde when used. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:25 am by Jeff Gamso
It wasn't unanimous (though at 8-1 it wasn't exactly a nail-biter, either), nor did it have to be. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
  What the American people want is an economy that doesn’t feel like the United States of Quicksand. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:27 am by Lara
  Coach recently filed a federal lawsuit against Alabama business Rose Nails and its owner, Dung V. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am by INFORRM
  Judgment in the case of KC v MGN Ltd ([2012] EWHC 483 (QB)) was handed down on 5 March 2012. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:33 am by Jeff Gamso
  Moyer quoted a passage from Judge Jerome Frank's dissent in United States v. [read post]