Search for: "People v. New"
Results 341 - 360
of 41,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:25 pm
New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 (Apprendi) and Blakely v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
The post Alabama AG argues state can prosecute people who help others obtain abortion care appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:37 pm
New York State's recent judicial collaboration with Indigenous partners: The story of New York's federal-state-tribal courts and Indian Nations Justice Forum. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging the president and his communications team violated the First Amendment by blocking seven people from the @realDonaldTrump Twitter account because they criticized the president or his policies. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
Critics fear the Tories will now move to cripple Ofcom — and then quietly relax the restrictions on Sky News … THE PRESS GANG campaign — The People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am
New York v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:50 pm
But Ray, you can’t be sucker punching people because things aren’t going your way. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
So, yep, other people have used the same term. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
And since it doesn't get you much these days to have a scrip, we shouldn't expect people to have it in any event. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:00 pm
Since the Supreme Court recognized marriage equality in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 6:42 am
The latest volume of the New Zealand Yearbook of International Law (Vol. 10, 2012) is out. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 1:27 am
People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 12:25 pm
People v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm
The front page of the New York Times (May 31, 2011) contains a great story by Peter Lattman, quoting me, on the pending case of Simkin v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:36 pm
In the People v Foster 27 NY2d 47 52 [1970] the defendant challenged the admission of the speedometer deviation record into evidence to prove the reliability of the speedometer. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
In Cho v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
People ex rel. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 10:02 am
The bill was passed in response to the state Court of Appeals [official website] decision in People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:34 am
But the trial judge granted a new trial, and the Court of Appeal held that although the jury's verdict might perhaps be reinstated, the Double Jeopardy Clause barred a new trial.The California Supreme Court reversed and remanded, unanimously holding that a new trial was permissible.Among other things, today's opinion shows just how troubling Supreme Court dicta can be. [read post]
