Search for: "People v. Novo"
Results 341 - 360
of 503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm
That’s what de novo means for courts! [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:50 am
Int’l, Inc v eSpeed, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) ITC: Public version of initial determination issued in investigation regarding semiconductor chips (complaint by Rambus against ASUS, NVIDIA and others) (ITC 337 Law Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – If authentic, new email from Steve Jobs has indicated Apple and Microsoft could be preparing to challenge validity of open-source video codecs (ZDNet) MobileMedia -… [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:51 pm
., Syed v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:41 am
The Appellate Division disagreed, finding in State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:41 am
Baron recalled that the Texas Supreme Court observed in O’Neal v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:22 am
Among the seven reforms, the bill provides for de novo review of whistleblower decisions in Tax Court and imposes interest on whistleblower awards that are subject to significant delay. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 1:31 pm
Judge Closes Courtroom to Observers Midtrial—Murder Conviction Reversed In People of Michigan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 5:53 am
” People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
One company sent more than 415,000 text messages without valid consent, encouraging people to get “free advice”, whilst another made unsolicited calls about pensions. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 10:43 am
West Adams Heritage Association et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:46 am
Protecting content v. potential impediments to future innovations. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
(with one concurrence by Martin disagreeing with majority’s decision to perform de novo review of merits after finding petition did not meet requirements of AEDPA); and McClain v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm
And a consular official’s denial of a visa based on national security inadmissibility grounds was the subject of a 2015 decision cited approvingly by the majority: Kerry v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:32 pm
Recall notice: Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
